Science Education
Taught at home my main science book was Life How Did It Get Here? Evolution or Creation? I think you can guess the conclusion it drew based on the bible. Basing our knowledge of the natural world on an ancient manuscript rather than the evidence around us is nothing short of an educational scandal.
The Institute of Medicine of The National Academy of Sciences, USA has published a report entitled Science, Evolution, and Creationism which answers the question:
How did life evolve on Earth? The answer to this question can help us understand our past and prepare for our future. Although evolution provides credible and reliable answers, polls show that many people turn away from science, seeking other explanations with which they are more comfortable.
In the book Science, Evolution, and Creationism, a group of experts
assembled by the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine explain the fundamental methods of science, document the overwhelming evidence in support of biological evolution, and evaluate the alternative perspectives offered by advocates of various kinds of creationism, including “intelligent design.” The book explores the many fascinating inquiries being pursued that put the science of evolution to work in preventing and treating human disease, developing new agricultural products, and fostering industrial innovations. The book also presents the scientific and legal reasons for not teaching creationist ideas in public school science classes.
Mindful of school board battles and recent court decisions, Science, Evolution, and Creationism shows that science and religion should be viewed as different ways of understanding the world rather than as frameworks that are in conflict with each other and that the evidence for evolution can be fully compatible with religious faith. For educators, students, teachers, community leaders, legislators, policy makers, and parents who seek to understand the basis of evolutionary science, this publication will be an essential resource.
The report can be downloaded here.
Evolution and creationism can never be compatible because evolution denies the very existence of God and especially in creating the world. Creationism says we are created in the imagine of God; evolution says our ancesters were apes. Creationism says God created the world in 6 days; evolution says the world “evolved” over millions of years. Evolution can never line up with what God says. I choose to go with what God says. After all, He is our Creator. How can we go against the Creator and win?
THE NEW DISCIPLINE!
Things will never be the same in academia after this.
There is a new discipline on the scene: physical science, the old science of cause and effect.
Against the backdrop of a nation embroiled in debate and legal battles over whether creationism or evolution, or both, should be taught in the classroom, The Quest for Right proclaims a
DAY OF VICTORY!
The Quest for Right, a series of seven textbooks designed for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences. As a result, the several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible: to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution. The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and en- lightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately replace the unprofitable Darwinian view.
The backbone of Darwinism is not biological evolution per se, but electronic interpretation, the tenet that all physical, chemical, and biological processes result from a change in the electron structure of the atom which, in turn, may be deciphered through the orderly application of mathematics, as outlined in quantum mechanics. A few of the supporting theories are: degrading stars, neutron stars, black holes, extraterrestrial water, antimatter, the absolute dating systems, and the big bang, the explosion of a singularity infinitely smaller than the dot of an “i” from which space, time, and the massive stellar bodies supposedly sprang into being.
The philosophy rejects any divine intervention. Therefore, let the philosophy of Darwinism be judged on these specifics: electron interpretation and quantum mechanics. Conversely, the view that God is both responsible for and rules all the phenomena of the universe will stand or fall when the facts are applied. The view will not hinge on faith alone, but will be tested by the weightier principle of verifiable truths – the new discipline.
The Quest for Right is not only better at explaining natural phenomena, but also may be verified through testing. As a result, the material in the several volumes will not violate the so-called constitutional separation of church and state. Physical science, the old science of cause and effect, will have a long-term sustainability, replacing irresponsible doctrines based on whim. Teachers and students will rejoice in the simplicity of earthly phenomena when entertained by the new discipline. You will not want to miss the adventure of a lifetime that awaits you in Volume 1 of The Quest for Right, by C. David Parsons.
Visit the official website for additional information: http://questforright.com/
“A book that will change the world.” – Wayne Lin, Editor, Tate Publishing LLC
____________________________________________________
In the News: The Quest for Right is entering the creationism/evolution debate in Florida, Texas, and South Carolina. Several hundred copies of Volume 1 have been earmarked to be shipped to concerned school board superintendents and school board members later this month.
lgpars
January 20, 2008 at 3:22 pm
Evolution’s Deathtrap:
As parents, we are to “train up a child in the way he should go:”. In doing so, the child is directed to “remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth,”. So what are our educators presently doing? They are teaching our children that there is a tooth fairy that gives you a dollar for your lost tooth if you put it under your pillow at night. How about the teaching that there is a “Santa Claus” that flies through the air with reindeer, who comes down the chimney on Christmas Eve to deliver gifts that you wished for. I guess that those that live in apartment buildings have to have some other delivery fable taught. What about “magic Santa keys”?
Yes, I am pointing out the insanity and bias of the practice of only teaching our students the theory of evolution, causing an imbalance in education. Creationism can hardly be taught, but the “Observations of Moses” can easily be taught our students, as a counter balance to the blind teaching of evolution (Atheism). There is no evidence for evolution, except in the closed mind of blind academics, administrators, and scientists. Evolution is a shallow conclusion of the fossil record (of death), and there is another, more probable, interpretation which is not being considered.
What circumstantial evidence is used to come to the conclusion of “evolution”? The very same evidence that (the “Observations of Moses”) states that there was “death by escalation”, meaning that death to life forms first came to the simplest of creatures in the water (out of sight of land dwellers), before escalating to higher life forms that already lived on land. With this position, you get the exact same results in the geologic record, but without the phantom “transitional forms”. Original created life did not grow old and die, if left to it’s own. External forces caused their escalated death on at least three occasions, the most intense being in 245 Million BC. Just because death is discovered to have occurred initially in the water, does not mean that there was not also life on land at the same time.
The atheist and evolutionist are motivated by the evil spirit of rebellion against God, whose goal is to destroy as much of mankind as possible. Take notice of their strategy, which is to only have the secular theories of science required and taught in public schools. But when it comes to teaching (the correct data) from the book of Genesis, they say “teach it in religion class, because it’s religion, and not science”. That is a bold face lie!! The very teaching of evolution is indoctrination into the religion of Atheism!! It is Satan’s mission to deny the reality of God and His Word, or at least redefine the scriptures, so that he can destroy all of mankind that he can. Evolution denies the existence of both the Creator, and of the Entity of Evil. Denial of the supernatural, which gave birth to the natural, is worst than foolishness.
How can the Observations of Moses not be science? If Moses was given an overview (six visions) of the 4.6 billion year history of our Earth and universe, and saw the several different life forms as they lived in the ancient past, how is that not science? Is science the denial of reality, and the redefinition of history? Does it seek to destroy the minds of our students? Take notice that evolutionists don’t want any other theory taught in science class. The truth is not afraid of exposure, but a falsehood is fearful of the light. Also take note that evolutionists require much more evidence for “creation” than they do for their own beliefs. For example, ask for proof of the “primordial soup”.
The seven-day creationists, such as those who support Creation Science and Biblical Reality, are motivated by the desire to rescue mankind, by trying to convey the truth of history, and the reality of our existence. However, Creation Science teaches foolish doctrines, by denying scientific reality, and along with Ruin & Restoration, they end up redefining God’s Word in order to make it “fit” their false teaching. For example, ask them “where did the water come from on the first day?”. Also, ask them “were the birds created one day before Adam, or on the same day after Adam?”. They can’t answer without redefinition of what is written, throwing “literal interpretation” out the window.
Theistic evolution, Day/Age, and progressive creationists deny the truth of God’s Word, and also teach false doctrine. They deny the 24-hr day, saying that those days were long periods of time. They call God a liar, by denying that God created our Earth and universe all in six 24-hr days. Ask them “How long did God tell Joshua to march around Jericho?”. Were those also long periods of time? But at least they try to acknowledge the Eternal Spirit, His creation of our existence, and the truth of history.
However, this article is named “The Deathtrap of Evolution”, and for good reason. Since there indeed is a Creator, there is indeed a coming judgment of all mankind, both modern and prehistoric. At the White Throne Judgment, approximately 1,020 years from now, every (remaining) human being, that has ever lived on this planet, whether they be Homo Sapiens, Cro-Magnon, Neanderthal, or original mankind, will stand trial and must give an account of their deeds while they lived on this Earth.
What sort of “an account” will an atheist or evolutionist be able to give? Will the excuse “I didn’t see any evidence” be accepted, and the person will be allowed to live forever in peace? Or will the option to remain in ignorance, and denial of the truth of Genesis (as written in the book “Moses Didn’t Write About Creation!”), be charged against the person, and they be thrown into the waiting Lake of Fire to be tormented forever? What about those in public office that failed to provide a balanced education?
Just imagine the laughter that many atheists and evolutionists now exhibit when the thought of a Creator is discussed. They want to believe, and teach to others, that all life on Earth, and the origin of the universe, all came into existence by random chance. Now imagine their shock when they find themselves standing in line, with tens of thousands of other humans, waiting to be judged by someone that they may have laughed at. Be assured that those that have done wrong against certain others, will be judged by that very same person, who will have the given authority to grant everlasting life or everlasting torment. This scenario would be discussed in another book, not yet written.
So what is the final conclusion? It is that the fossil and geologic record of the ancient past gives solid proof of the truth of Genesis, namely the Observations of Moses, without the need of non-existent transitional forms which the theory of evolution relies on. God first created, and then restored life on Earth after each extinction event, in six different geological eras of mankind in the past. No modern human has both seen and written about the prehistoric past, except Moses, as revealed to him by God Himself.
So if secular science wants to teach their conclusions from geologic data, so be it. But also teach the correct interpretation of early Genesis (not creation science), else the religion of Atheism is being indoctrinated into our students, by the state and local governments, contrary to the U.S. Constitution.
Herman Cummings
Ephraim7@aol.com
PO Box 1745
Fortson GA, 31808
Herman Cummings
January 20, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Creationism = Intelligent Design = Physical Science
Re-market the brand, but it is what it is.
Evolution and atheism are not the same thing. One is a scientific theory that is a fact. The other is a world view based on the understanding that super-naturalism is not necessary to explain the natural world, and rejects the notion that a god has to be responsible for the cosmos.
As to the benefits of using evolution theory, would it make a difference to you? Probably not but the truth is out there.
homoeconomicusnet
January 20, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Evolution’s Deathtrap:
Where to start?
In a science class the education should be based on science. I have no problem with children learning about religion – but I would like them to explore all creationist myths, and examine them around the world – or else they would have an imbalance in their education.
No you cannot get away with “we are so complicated we need a creator who is even more complex – but did not have a beginning”. The evidence strongly suggests that complexity develops out of simplicity. Perhaps reading “The Selfish Gene” and “The Blind Watch-Maker” would help out there.
Again you miss the point. How is the Christian god more true then the Muslim god? All your claims are based on supposed miracles, sacred texts, and faith. I cannot test your claims. Easier in science. Evolution is a theory because of the verification of facts and the value of the predictions made with a body of work.
Science is about the natural world – not super naturalism. Secularism is about not being biased by faith or against a particular faith. It is in the best sense the manifestation and protection of the freedom of religion and non religion, and the individual liberty of the citizen from government and group tyranny.
Atheism is not a religion. There is no creed, no unifying philosophy, no commandment, no law giver, no heaven or damnation, no one to worship or fear. It is possible to believe in god and accept evolution as a scientific theory. Kenneth Miller does that. I may not agree with him about god – but I do recognise facts when supported by evidence.
When Judgment day comes give me a ring – I have slept through the last ones. Darn it in over a thousand years? And a white throne (not cream, silver or gold?)? No worries then. Mind you – what if the true god is Allah? You nervous. Of course not.
Same reason I am not about your god. Thanks for playing!
homoeconomicusnet
January 20, 2008 at 8:26 pm