Civil Discourse

The freedom to speak does imply the ability to listen. By that logic you will hear things that may offend you. That you may benefit from hearing such things is a right no one should deprive you of.

Brought up in the Jehovah’s Witnesses from nine to fourteen, there was no Internet let alone mobile phones around. Had they been, the opportunity to engage by witnessing (preaching) to Darwinists would have been tempting. I am certain that would have been considered trolling, rather than a genuine attempt to save people.

That is one reason evidence and explaining science is not enough. Al Gore in “An Inconvenient Truth” uses the quote:

It is difficult to get someone to understand something when their salary depends upon them not understanding it.

Replace the word salary with salvation, you might appreciate what is at stake for someone. Equally, why they seem so intent trying to talk you out of it.

20121212-095801.jpg

Civility can be difficult at these times. On PZ Myers’ (pictured above, the one on the left) blog “Pharyngula” a clear line was drawn and he made a ruling where a detractor was being harassed by other commentators:

StevOr has received threats to disclose his identity if he doesn’t leave Pharyngula permanently. You may not like him, you may oppose what he says, but anyone who pulls that kind of stunt will find themselves banned.

SteveOr having thanked PZ Myers made this reply:

For what its worth I’ll certainly admit that in the past I have said some things I now no longer believe and aren’t proud of and suspect this is probably true of just about everybody.

I’m the first person to admit that I’m fallible, sometimes mistaken and have said a few silly things and been carried away when drunk and overtired and will try to do better in future.

Source Pharyngula

Humanism, as mentioned in the previous blog, requires an open exchange of views. Without we cannot develop our thoughts and ideas. Threats and a lack of civility go against that.

The House of Lords will hopefully today remove the word “insult” from section 5 of the Public Order Act.

Related Blogs: Reform Section 5 now

What is humanism?

Article written by John Sargeant on Homo economicus’ Weblog

Follow @JPSargeant78

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under blogs

One response to “Civil Discourse

  1. Reblogged this on Gary William Murning Online and commented:
    Excellent piece on the need for offence and how that doesn’t have to mean a lack of civility.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s