Tony Blair Islamophobic?


Tony Blair had a number of things to say about Islam in The Mail On Sunday. Having said there was no problem with Islam as a religion of peace:

But there is a problem within Islam – from the adherents of an ideology that is a strain within Islam. And we have to put it on the table and be honest about it.

Of course there are Christian extremists and Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu ones. But I am afraid this strain is not the province of a few extremists. It has at its heart a view about religion and about the interaction between religion and politics that is not compatible with pluralistic, liberal, open-minded societies.

At the extreme end of the spectrum are terrorists, but the world view goes deeper and wider than it is comfortable for us to admit. So by and large we don’t admit it. This has two effects. First, those with that view think we are weak and that gives them strength.

Second, those within Islam – and the good news is there are many – who actually know this problem exists and want to do something about it, lose heart. All over the Middle East and beyond there is a struggle being played out.

On the one side, there are Islamists who have this exclusivist and reactionary world view. They are a significant minority, loud and well organised. On the other are the modern-minded, those who hated the old oppression by corrupt dictators and who hate the new oppression by religious fanatics. They are potentially the majority, but unfortunately they are badly organised.

The seeds of future fanaticism and terror, possibly even major conflict, are being sown. We have to help sow seeds of reconciliation and peace. But clearing the ground for peace is not always peaceful.

There is an enemy within that Islam needs to deal with – an ideology that cherry picks the Koran for a jihad against the west for being a pluralistic, liberal open minded society. For some though that goes against the grain of blaming western interference in the Arab region as the number one cause for Islamic extremism.

Blair’s critics would rather paint Islamic radicals as victims reacting against imperialist aggression, put on a war footing caused in no small part by the “war criminal” Tony Blair himself. That however does not work when we see in public policy how Islamist governments behave, and the political goal of Al Qaeda as a single Islamic nation for the Arab world and as a social movement for theocratic absolutism.

Update 3/6: More on that can be read on this post by Edisa of the Humane Intervention Centre.

Mo Ansar has taken exception to what Tony Blair wrote:


The cricket did not seem to help much:


I have asked Ansar to give a detailed critique rather than mud slinging. Blair went out of his way to praise Islam as a religion of peace and call the problem an ideology. The only modern way he suggests this can be beaten is:

The better idea is a modern view of religion and its place in society and politics. There has to be respect and equality between people of different faiths. Religion must have a voice in the political system but not govern it.

We have to start with how to educate children about faith, here and abroad. That is why I started a foundation whose specific purpose is to educate children of different faiths across the world to learn about each other and live with each other.

If that makes Tony Blair an islamophobic the word has been debased as an attempt to silence critics rather than deal with hate and violent crimes committed against Muslim people.

Ansar, we need to talk about the ideology that exists within Islam and how it is going to be challenged externally and internally. In the meantime we will do our best to maintain a secular liberal pluralistic society as our contribution. We need you to tackle the ideology of the extremists. You are ideally placed to complete this mission, knowing Islam as you do. Maybe the way you reacted, throwing your toys out of the pram, was just a cover for the real task that lies ahead. That in reality you will seek and counter hatred that is perpetuated in the name of your faith. Maybe it is so covert we just cannot see this in action through the mud racking.

Time for some intrafaith dialogue even if behind the scenes.

Article written by John Sargeant on Homo economicus’ Weblog

Follow @JPSargeant78


Filed under British Politics, British Society, politics, Religion, World

3 responses to “Tony Blair Islamophobic?

  1. Saw this response by Damian Thompson Not totaly fair, but bit about new labour’s “flatulent platitudes” has, something to it.

    • Misses that the ideology problem within Islam is global, and with modern travel and communication the issue of how to prevent radicalisation to violent jihad runs much deeper than just central government. A key role in organising, but not the main player by any means on the issue.

      Reason I am so critical of Ansar’s response. As a spokesman in the media he has a platform to take on the ideology. He would rather defend Islam, deny there is a problem caused internally, and slur people who point out there is an issue that needs challenging.

      Labour did try responses (tagging, house arrest, long detention periods etc) but it is not just about government. It is about faith leaders, and the rest of us, speaking up for pluralism, religious freedom and democracy.

      Apathy and disillusionment is something we can challenge, and civil society provides outlets for dissent which can make a difference.The evidence for that is the political process.

      It works far more effectively than terrorism does.

      • True, but I do think there is a case to be made that TB and NL were so busy proving what funky, feng shuied, re-birthed kinda guys they were that they patronized all kinds of religious & New Age mysticism, thus helping legitimize them. Mr Ansar, along with other nonsense mongers have benefited from this. Blair and NL were hardly the first, or last to do this (how many in our current govt support homeopathy, or have cozied up to right wing Christian groups?). It’s a central problem for our system of government. With our (unelected) head of state also being the head of a church, mysticism is hardwired into our nation’s (unwritten) constitution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s