Tommy Robinson – Actions and Words Required


“I have been considering this move for a long time because I recognise that, though street demonstrations have brought us to this point, they are no longer productive. I acknowledge the dangers of far-right extremism and the ongoing need to counter Islamist ideology not with violence but with better, democratic ideas. ~ Tommy Robinson

On hearing the news that Tommy Robinson has left the English Defence League he formed in 2009 I was hopeful, but cynical. Hopeful because he seemed to recognise the problem with street marches I had criticised the EDL for but cynical that he has changed his mind on key issues he stood for. As I said in an article he read and tweeted:

Our criticisms require us to be well heeled in knowledge of Islam and extremism without wearing jackboots ourselves. If the shoe fits I hope you find it uncomfortable and take off quickly before marching against the ideals you claim to be protecting.

As Ghaffar Hussain says, ‘The far-Right has been evolving in their tactics and strategy and seeking to adapt to their environment in order to survive. One of the outcomes of this adaption has been the attempt to hijack the anti-extremist agenda in order to drive through a hidden racist and xenophobic agenda.’

I will continue to criticise religion – but I will not welcome as fellow critics those on the far right that promote solutions that would erode secularism in this country, not encourage secularised Islam to flourish, and would deny freedoms that are the rights of all citizens in this country regardless of creed or skin colour.

At the press conference Tuesday 8 October we heard from the same Tommy Robinson who was at a demonstration a few weeks ago in Sheffield complaining about another mosque being built stating “at what point does diversity become takeover?” He claimed at the press conference that his target all along was Islamism. This revisionism just does not wash – his actions and words are too well documented unless you want to believe otherwise. The EDL under his leadership were against Muslims and he gave voice to this whether on immigration or as part of the community.

This Saturday there is to be an EDL march in Bradford. How well this is supported and by whom may give us an early indication on the organisational abilities of the group. What seems clear is that Tommy with like minded ex EDL members and co founder Kevin Carroll wish to create a new group.

This appears to be a lobby group – and Tommy has had meetings not just with the Quilliam Foundation in order to understand Islam better. However, those instincts and prejudices we have seen will die hard. The suspicion is not at all – the most we can hope for is less public agitation on the streets may make public order and community tensions easier.

That though is not in the hands of Tommy and Kevin anymore. Tommy revealed there was an attempt to usurp him whilst he was incarcerated. So this may be more a career move than a change of heart considering the inner conflicts that were looking to remove both him and Kevin. Forces he freely admits he could no longer control.

If we genuinely believe Tommy the EDL could become even worse – the question is will it disband into it’s component parts or become more potent on the streets. It would benefit all to think we can now concentrate more on radicalisation to extreme Islamism, combating militant Islamism and Islamist ideology.

We have given his character, behaviour and past actions not just the right to be sceptical but the need to be so till Tommy proves himself. Quilliam have given Tommy that opportunity. Let us see if he can seize it. He needs more than a name change this time to try and escape his past.

Article written by John Sargeant on Homo economicus’ Weblog

Follow @JPSargeant78

My Huffington Post Blog


1 Comment

Filed under British Politics, British Society, politics, Religion, secular

One response to “Tommy Robinson – Actions and Words Required

  1. Mark

    Anyone with half a brain, who watches things unfold on TV and keeps an eye on Twitter etc, would have seen this coming months ago. Robinson started getting TV appearances, and post Woolwich, both TV and radio appearances. He appeared with Pam Gellar in New York. He cosied up to Mohammed Ansar, who frankly, cosied up back, with a ‘matey’ Twitter relationship, outside of private dealings.
    Immediately post Woolwich (aside from the night itself), there were two EDL marches, which for all I know, had been long-planned anyway. But as some months went by and further marches were less well attended, would he not see that the EDL was going nowhere, and he was outgrowing them? He could no longer associate himself with the absolute undeucated thug persona of his followers.
    Robinson has given mixed messages since I first became aware of him on TV, which was a BBC The Big Questions program (presented by Nicky Campbell), possibly in 2012. Each and every TV and radio interview has been about “militant Islamism” etc, with denials about anything else. Things said on public marches have suggested the something else is there, and the “Islamism” thing was just a smokescreen. Even right up to Newsnight last night, the interviewers all have the same questions, so we simply hear the same denials and the same rhetoric regarding “Islamism.” They could have easily just shown an interview from six months ago, and very little would have changed. Might anyone think Robinson has found this easier and easier to handle?
    I’m no journalist, but I would have thought by now, that their questioning would have taken a much more probing, and dare I say it, informative and investigative approach.
    Now we have the strange situation of certain Muslim commentators and left wing writers having veiled, although unexplained, suspicions of Quilliam. And on the same day, the MI5 chief states that there could be “thousands” of home-grown Islamist terrorists who see the general public as legitinate targets. Who is actually on whose side?
    On a personal level, it has been annoying that Robinson chooses certain lines of rhetoric. If Hitchens, Dawkins and Harris have said that mosques in the West are being built with Saudi money, populating them with wahabi-style Qurans and inviting hate preachers, how can I reject it when Robinson says the same things? I reject the EDL and am suspicious that Robinson is using the Islamist thing as a cover for a wider racist agenda, and believe that journalists could do a better job on him, than they have been doing so far.
    It seems that we now have the pleasure of a TV documentary, presented by Nicky Campbell and “starring” Robinson and Ansar. I can’t help but feel that they have acheived what they were looking for to this point.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s