Myriam Francois-Cerrah: The Usurpation of Liberal Feminism

IMG_2252.JPG

Myriam Francois-Cerrah has written a scathing review of Yasmin Alibhai-Brown’s book Refusing the Veil. Her article in The Newstatesman argues up is down: Yasmin has downplayed religious identity because of her middle class niche circle prejudices, that being against how some women dress is social conservatism, and that her racial heritage and anti-racism is diminished by her empowering anti-muslim prejudice.

The debate of how Wahhabism is growing as a movement in the UK with how women are viewed, treated and presented within Islam, deserves better than this article. Myriam claims that by a woman choosing to be a Wahhabist or Islamist, and dressing in the niqab/burka, there can be no question of misogyny if they identify it as empowering and their religion.

By the same reasoning, you can read feminist support for FGM as cultural traditional values which women choose for themselves and their daughters. Just do not dare to call it female genital mutilation you white liberal cultural imperialist.

Taj Hargey insists we call the face veil a face mask. The intent to hide away the facial expressions and appearance of women from society, to make such an observation the property of her husband, is one that should outrage feminists. For if this is not misoynistic, please do insist men as an expression of their faith and cultural identity cover their faces too. The view that if women must be in the public space, let them be hidden in plain sight, is not gender empowering.

Veiling is not part of social liberal feminism; the veil is a patriarchal response to male libido by suppressing the female form by misogynistic application. Social conservatism at its worse when it suppresses men and women when it fears sex by thought (the veil, segregation) or by deed (FGM). No matter how much you try to reinvent what these actions and dress mean you cannot escape the reason behind them.

A Vitamin D deficiency caused by excessive covering of the skin – take a supplement is Myriam’s response. Let us not even explore that our bodies require exposure to sunlight to be healthy, that Allah must have designed us this way but God demands an action that can lead to health problems.

Yasmin is accused, in the most scholarly way of avoiding the word, of being a coconut. Brown on the outside white on the inside. Difficult for a recent white convert to pull off, but Myriam does it rather well. Middle class views have made Yasmin betray her muslim heritage and racial identity; let alone the sisterhood. Worse, she is fuelling anti-muslim prejudice by critiquing the veil. That there can be an open debate by muslims regarding the veil is to be resisted because racists and bigots may jump on the bandwagon to suppress muslims because their skin colour is usually not white.

Myriam Francois-Cerrah has written a masterpiece in how to usurp liberal feminism in the cause of reactionary orthodoxism. The bottom line is no legal power should be used to coerce women to dress a certain way in a park. The French anti-veil law is communitarianism; claiming to make citizens equal by same identity of appearance. That is not in the same league as Saudi Arabia requiring veiling with extreme punishments. However, liberals should oppose banning the veil in a park – it is no business of the state sanctioning what you wear (or do not) in a public space as a crime.

The threat to Islam and Muslim women is the promotion, let alone tolerance, of reactionary and oppressive Wahabbism in the UK. That is why Yasmin is the liberal feminist here while Myriam has shown herself siding with the social conservatism of Islam.

Murdering language cannot disguise the attempt to usurp liberal values. Nor does undermining liberalism help in tackling anti-muslim prejudice.

(A more detailed essay on the niqab may be read here)

Article written by John Sargeant on Homo economicus’ Weblog

Follow @JPSargeant78

My Huffington Post Blog

Advertisements

6 Comments

Filed under British Society, Religion, secular

6 responses to “Myriam Francois-Cerrah: The Usurpation of Liberal Feminism

  1. In the bleak midwinter

    Hyper privileged, upper class Myriam sells all women, but her self obsessed, intellectual, over privileged clique, down the river.
    She is Shami Witness disguised as Shami Chakrabarti.

  2. What is Francois-Cerrah anyway? You referred to her as a “recent convert” and on a Big Questions program this year, in response to her, Douglas Murray used the same description. She shot back, “I don’t refer to myself as that,” (no time for an explanation). On a Big Questions program from, I think, 2009, she introduced herself as “A convert to the religion.” So what is she now, a revert? Has she “moved on,” so to speak?

    She tweeted, before the originally scheduled Daily Politics debate (which was delayed for a few days), “I hate discussing the veil,” and then writes a very long article on the subject.

    It seems to me, that in UK society, the main base point most people start with is the uncomfortable social aspect of the veil, but then get drawn into all of the other obvious points that crop up, time and again.

    Modesty
    It’s my religion
    It’s not in the Quran
    It is in the Quran
    It’s only cultural
    Male oppression
    I feel liberated
    Force
    Choice
    Bikinis!

    …and a few other favourites, including the ridiculous.

    It’s a simple subject in many ways, but Francois-Cerrah must spend quite a bit of time, coming up with all sorts of “intellectual” angles.

  3. As I’ve noticed elsewhere, there’s no mention in this piece that Yasmin belongs to a sect (Nizari Ismailis) that actually bans the hijab and niqab among its members. I would have thought that would be pretty important.

  4. Madge Hirsch

    Very good piece. I especially liked your point about the vit d. Recent research at the University of Edinburgh has shown that the UVA rays in sunlight lead to nitric oxide production in the body when they fall on bare skin. This reduces blood presssure. We evolvedfrom hairy to smooth(ish) but we evolved naked. The sun is vital to a healthy life. Our skin is the largest organ of our body. It is just not natural to have all of it covered all of the time. Their has been a very large increase in Iran in MS since the revolution-in women.

  5. Myriam Francois-Cerrah is exactly like those 1930s upper-class English women who were, along with huge swathes of the British aristocracy (which notoriously extended all the way to the royal family), openly supportive of Nazism. Particularly the Mitford sisters. Unity, Hitler’s friend and rumoured lover and Diana, wife of British Fascist leader Oswald Moseley. Educated, privileged, exceptionally well-mannered and beautiful… and totally complicit in totalitarian denial of the most basic human rights. To say nothing of the horror that denial often entails.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s